The Web is part of the face of enterprise development. Among the main factors for Java Enterprise Edition’s prominence as one of the most popular platforms for enterprise application development can be properly attributed to its usage in creating the web part. Through the years, web development got a lot of attention, resulting in a rise of development from a variety of sources. It’s fairly intriguing to see that the ascription of development applied with each new framework and libraries in the development process kept the ground soppy for another.
For instance, when Servlet was making its mark, JSP came in to supersede while JSF was not weaned till then. The line endlessed from 3rd party innovators as, well, look at struts 2, Spring Web MVC, Grails … many more. They have altered a lot since their inception. There would be lots of write needed to do justice to a topic such as, “… closer appearance.” Take this article as a tip to some nooks and corners of web development from the perspective of framework usages.
Have a look at the framework rush. Let’s indent it within the domain of a certain framework category. Nevertheless, this list is a pointer of the iceberg, actually; there’s a lot more:
Full Stack Frameworks
- Rails, Grails, play, Ninja, Spring Roo.
- Glassfish, RestEasy, Apache CXF, Vert.x, Spring Boot.
Pure JVM Web Frameworks
- Apache: Wicket, Struts, Sling, Tapestry, Click.
- GWT: SmartGWT, GXT, Vaadin, Errai.
- JSF: Mojarra (RI), MyFaces, IceFaces, RichFaces, PrimeFaces.
- Spring MVC, Stripes, RIFE, ZK.
The Web is scattered with short articles, documentation about a number of the list products given above. Each of them has extensive usages and strong reasons to exist. The list can be frustrating, and virtually, it is. Once one recognizes with what one requirements, choosing a few of them is not that challenging. We shall, nevertheless, handle the problem of choice down the line. Stay tuned for next set of articles that will use up a single framework and delve further into the information.
The Problem Is Choose
The solution to the issue of option is not driven by the variety of frameworks we have at our disposal however by the comprehensive concept of the framework that fits our requirements.
Frameworks are not an outright fact of software development; rather, they’re a tool to leverage performance. They basically provide a set of application norms. If these standards are followed correctly, it makes sure that the application is developed in compliance of the business guidelines. A framework assists in keeping the codes structured. And Structured codes are relatively simple to maintain and update (disorganized codes are one of the most significant concern of software engineering). A framework often consists of design template engines that put down basic procedures, leading to a prospective end. This is the certain reason why developers’ productivity is leveraged. It is as if there is only one course to the solution. Flexibility and discrepancy are controlled to avoid erroneous consequence. the cautious use of boiler-plate modules or reuse of in-built components saves time and energy to focus on the business issue instead of eluding with setup, setup, and other recurring tasks.
The Darker Side
The disadvantage is that frameworks, when blindly applied, practically put blinkers (in the sense that when you have a hammer as the only tool, all problem appears like a nail) and decrease the option of non-traditional or deviated solution to an issue. Sacrificing flexibility in favor of performance might benefit some situation such as developing a basic application. But, in cases that require high advancement, using a framework is an absolutely bad option (unless the framework is flexible enough or have space for restoration). For instance, take the case of Hibernate; it is certainly an outstanding ORM tool. However, when you require an extremely enhanced table with a very compact database, a really superficial use of the tool will not be extremely helpful. Fortunately, such cases are a few. A lot of industrial applications constructed are e-commerce, deal processing, and the like. It is undeniable that, while producing such an enterprise application, a framework can save the day.
Frameworks for web development are developed by the people who thought to ease the developers job by providing themselves a track to follow due to the fact that many of the time while producing web part these tracks are nothing however guidelines of dynamic paging, database connection, UI element rendering, etc.
Which framework should one pick and when? I think, previously you have actually guessed it. Each framework is excellent at something and not so proficient at another. So, the definitive element of picking a framework depends on the requirement of the project at hand. the knowledge required is to extrapolate from the claims and weigh its use, undoubtedly, keeping the feet on the ground. For example, when JSF is enough, Spring MVC would make things more complex.
Which one to choose?
These is no providence, rather a tip to think or a list on ways to pick:.
- Do I actually need a framework?
- What do I expect the framework should have to satisfy my requirement?
- Get the documentation for the framework.
- Have I comprehended the framework as I understand my need?
- Select a few pertinent ones.
- Observe their market and maturity, since the general rule is that the frameworks primarily made use of are more trustworthy, though they might not be the best.
- Basic projects are well fit for conventional frameworks; they can be picked practically blindly.
Thus, the problem of option is reciprocated as the concern of understanding. Let’s make it easy.
Do I understand what I choose and have a choice to choose what I comprehend?
If the answer is ‘YES,’ you found the best framework you need.
Web development is a fairly complicated process and involves a various kind of technology such as HTML, XML, Scripting, Java, and so on due to the many performance it carries out. Also, this performance has to be similarly appealing with a visual UI. Developers need to keep the deal on both sides. To make this desktop like web application behavior, a big amount of code unnecessary for the business logic, but are composed for visual appeal. Frameworks systematize the code and application development process to relieve the life of the developer.