Benefits & Pitfalls of using Agile Scrum software development methodology

The numerous agile Scrum methods share much of the exact same viewpoint, as well as a lot of the exact same qualities and practices. But from an application standpoint, each has its own dish of practices, terminology, and techniques.

Scrum is a lightweight agile project management framework with broad applicability for managing and controlling iterative and incremental projects of all types. Scrum is an agile process most frequently made use of for product development, particularly software development. Scrum is a project management framework that applies to any project with aggressive due dates, complex requirements and a degree of uniqueness. In Scrum, tasks move forward through a series of models called sprints. Each sprint is typically 2 to 4 weeks long.

Here is a list of typical Scrum pitfalls or bad habits of Scrum groups:

Excessive Preparation/Planning: Regular big up-front planning is not needed with Scrum. Instead, a team can just begin and use constant feedback in the Sprint Review to adjust it’s plans. Even the Product Backlog can be produced after the first Sprint has actually begun.

Focus On Tools: Many companies try to find an electronic tool to help them manage the Scrum Process … before they even know how to do Scrum well! Use handbook and paper-based tracking for early Scrum use considering that it is most convenient to obtain started. Discovering a tool is normally simply a challenge to obtaining started.

Problem-Solving in the Daily Scrum: The Daily Scrum ought to not be used to discover solutions to problems (obstacles, obstacles) raised. Rather, keep the conference extremely brief and have those analytical discussions afterwards with just those who are interested. The ScrumMaster facilitates this conference to keep it on track.

Assigning Tasks: Even though the concept of self-organizing teams has actually been around for a long time, still some people think that a project manager or group lead must appoint tasks to team members. It is better to wait for someone to step up than to “take over” and assign a task.

Failed Sprint Restart: Although cancelling a Sprint is uncommon, it can be appealing to try and wait till everything is “perfect” or “ready” before re-starting. Teams need to right away re-start after cancelling a Sprint.

ScrumMaster As Contributor: The ScrumMaster is like a fire-fighter: it’s all right for them to be idle– simply enjoying the group– waiting for an emergency barrier. Taking on jobs has the tendency to sidetrack the ScrumMaster from the task of helping the group follow the rules of Scrum, from the task of strongly eliminating obstacles, and from the job of safeguarding the team from disturbances.

Product Owner Doesn’t Show: The Product Owner is a complete member of the group and should be present at all Scrum meetings (Planning, Review and Daily Scrums). As well, the Product Owner need to also be available throughout work time. Obviously, the PO also has to work with stakeholders and might be away during that time, however these conversations ought to be scheduled outside of the group’s conference times.

Stretch Goals: The group chooses how much work it will perform in a Sprint. No one ought to bring pressure on the group to over-commit. This simply builds animosity, distrust and encourages low-grade work. That said, of course teams can be motivated by challenging general project or product goals.

Heroics: Individuals on a Scrum team need to refrain from doing excessive individual overtime, or in any other way attempt to be the “hero” of the team. Scrum assists us build terrific teams of people, not groups of fantastic individuals.

Group Organizes Product Backlog: The group does not have correct insight into the needs of users and instead should be focused on resolving technical problems. The Product Owner has to be responsible for ROI and therefore ought to withstand any pressure from the group to do things in a particular order for “technical” factors.

Product Owner Specifies Solutions: The Product Owner should permit the team complete flexibility to come up with solutions to the problems presented in the Product Backlog. PBIs need to be free of technical specs unless they can be tied directly to a customer or end-user request.

Urgent Interruptions: Urgent interruptions should not be allowed in a Sprint … instead, if it is urgent enough, the team ought to cancel the Sprint. Otherwise, the disruption must be placed on the Product Backlog and deferred until the start of the next Sprint.

Making Assumptions: Often employee will fail to ask the Product Owner about information of the work they are doing. An employee addresses issues, however it is vital to find out about restrictions. The feedback in between PO and Team Member ought to be continuous throughout every day of the Sprint.

Not Getting Done: This is difficult to prevent from occurring from time to time, but it can become a routine for a group to over-commit. Ensure that a group that is doing this is using burndown charts successfully and is holding demos even when they have actually not completed all their work.

Demo Not Ready: Sometimes a team forgets that it will take some time to get ready for a demonstration: cleaning the team space, establishing a demo environment, getting scripts ready, and guaranteeing that crucial stakeholders are prepped. These activities can be part of the jobs in the Sprint Backlog.

Prototype Not Shippable: A Scrum team should attempt to produce production-quality, “possibly shippable” software right from the very first Sprint. Structure prototype code simply delays the inevitable have to compose production code. Likewise, wireframes, comprehensive designs and other similar tools must also be avoided.

Distributed Team: Although Scrum does not officially need team members to be collocated in a “war space”, the reality is that any distribution of employee (even just into separate cubicles) has a big unfavorable impact on transparency and communication, which in turn has a huge influence on efficiency and quality. Here is a YouTube video on dispersed Scrum teams.

Directive ScrumMaster: The ScrumMaster needs to be a facilitator who supports the group in learning self-organization, and the Scrum rules. The ScrumMaster should never succumb to the temptation to recommend how a team member does his/her work, nor what job next to work on.

Changing Team Membership: Scrum is a framework for producing high-performance product development groups. If the subscription of a Scrum team modifications, it requires that team to re-start the Forming-Storming-Norming-Performing series. If the team is in Norming or Performing, then changing team subscription for any factor is a waste of fairly an investment. Here is a YouTube video on changing Team Membership.

Non-Scrum Roles on the Scrum Team: It is typical for an organization to develop a Scrum group without changing the official title and tasks of the people who are members of that group. For example, an individual who is a Project Manager might be provided the obligations of the Product Owner without a main modification of title. Scrum groups must just have a ScrumMaster, a Product Owner, and Team Members.

Giving Up On Quality: Scrum has very high demands on groups regarding the quality of their outcomes: “potentially shippable software”. It is easy for a team or organization to draw on the crutch of problem tracking software instead of preserving very high levels of quality at all times (due to press to launch functions).

Enforced Deadline Scope And Resources: Scrum is reality-based. If an external stakeholder wishes to impose a minimum scope, a deadline and constrict the resources available to the group then they need to permit that quality will slip … which in turn is against the principles of Scrum. The reality is that no-one can anticipate the future so any such imposition is just a fantasy.

Meaning of “Done” Imposed: There is confusion in between the idea of the definition of “done” and “requirements”. Supervisors and other stakeholders commonly incorrectly enforce standards on a group as its definition of “done”.

ScrumMaster Not Present: I as soon as saw an organization that had actually created a room for a “team” of ScrumMasters. They worked there together the majority of the time! The only time the ScrumMaster should be far from the team is when he/she is dealing with getting rid of an obstacle that is outside the team. Otherwise, the ScrumMaster needs to be in the group’s room.

Post a comment